Skip to content
Last Dictionary

posterior

nounAlso: posterior distribution, posterior probability, a posteriori probability, posterior predictive distribution

In plain wordsWhat you believe after weighing new evidence against what you believed before. It is the updated belief that Bayes' theorem produces.

  1. The probability distributionprobability distribution, n.: A complete description of how likely each possible outcome is — for a fair die, one-sixth for each face. A language model produces one of these over its whole vocabulary at every step. over unknown parameters or hypotheses once the observed data have been taken into account: by Bayes' theoremBayes' theorem, n.: A formula for updating how much you believe something after seeing new evidence: weigh your earlier belief by how well that explanation predicts what you actually observed., the priorprior, n.: What you believe, and how strongly, before looking at the evidence in front of you. In AI it also means built-in assumptions that steer what a system learns. reweighted by the likelihoodlikelihood, n.: A score for a possible explanation of some data: how probable that explanation, or that setting of a model, would have made the data actually seen. of the data and rescaled by the marginal likelihood so that it sums or integrates to one. Bayesian conclusions are summaries of it — its peak is the MAP estimatemaximum a posteriori estimation, n.: Picking the single most believable setting of a model after combining the evidence with what was assumed beforehand. In practice it often amounts to ordinary training plus a penalty that keeps settings modest., its width expresses the uncertainty that remains, and predictions average over it (the posterior predictive distribution). For most models the normalizing constant is intractable, so the posterior is approximated by Markov chain Monte CarloMarkov chain Monte Carlo, n.: A family of methods for drawing random examples from a complicated probability distribution by taking a long, carefully designed random walk that eventually visits each region in proportion to its probability., variational inferencevariational inference, n.: A way of approximating a hard-to-compute probability distribution by picking the closest match from a simpler family of distributions, turning a hard problem of adding up every possibility into an optimization problem., Laplace approximations or ensembles; placing a posterior over a network's weights gives a Bayesian neural network. In generative modelinggenerative model, n.: A model that learns what a kind of data looks like — faces, sentences, songs — well enough to produce new examples that resemble the originals without copying them., 'the posterior' often means the distribution of latent variables given an observation, which a variational autoencodervariational autoencoder, n.: A neural network that learns to squeeze data into a compact, slightly fuzzy code and rebuild it, arranged so that decoding random codes produces new, plausible examples.'s encoder approximates.

    The posterior over the click-through rate is now narrow enough to stop the experiment.

p(θ∣D)=p(D∣θ) p(θ)∫p(D∣θ′) p(θ′) dθ′p(\theta \mid \mathcal{D}) = \frac{p(\mathcal{D}\mid\theta)\,p(\theta)}{\int p(\mathcal{D}\mid\theta')\,p(\theta')\,d\theta'}

Origin

Jacob Bernoulli's a posteriori (1713) referred to probabilities learned from observed outcomes; Thomas Bayes (1763) and Pierre-Simon Laplace (1774) computed what are now called posterior probabilities, long known as 'inverse probabilities'. 'Posterior distribution' became standard during the mid-20th-century Bayesian revival.

Related

See also
  • priorprior, n.: What you believe, and how strongly, before looking at the evidence in front of you. In AI it also means built-in assumptions that steer what a system learns.
  • likelihoodlikelihood, n.: A score for a possible explanation of some data: how probable that explanation, or that setting of a model, would have made the data actually seen.
  • Bayes' theoremBayes' theorem, n.: A formula for updating how much you believe something after seeing new evidence: weigh your earlier belief by how well that explanation predicts what you actually observed.
  • Bayesian inferenceBayesian inference, n.: Reasoning that treats unknowns as uncertain beliefs and updates them with evidence using Bayes' theorem. The result is not one answer but a range of answers, each with a probability.
  • Markov chain Monte CarloMarkov chain Monte Carlo, n.: A family of methods for drawing random examples from a complicated probability distribution by taking a long, carefully designed random walk that eventually visits each region in proportion to its probability.
  • variational inferencevariational inference, n.: A way of approximating a hard-to-compute probability distribution by picking the closest match from a simpler family of distributions, turning a hard problem of adding up every possibility into an optimization problem.
  • maximum a posteriori estimationmaximum a posteriori estimation, n.: Picking the single most believable setting of a model after combining the evidence with what was assumed beforehand. In practice it often amounts to ordinary training plus a penalty that keeps settings modest.
Contrast with
  • priorprior, n.: What you believe, and how strongly, before looking at the evidence in front of you. In AI it also means built-in assumptions that steer what a system learns.

Mentioned in

Bayes' theoremBayes' theorem, n.: A formula for updating how much you believe something after seeing new evidence: weigh your earlier belief by how well that explanation predicts what you actually observed., Bayesian inferenceBayesian inference, n.: Reasoning that treats unknowns as uncertain beliefs and updates them with evidence using Bayes' theorem. The result is not one answer but a range of answers, each with a probability., confidence intervalconfidence interval, n.: A range of plausible values for something being estimated, such as 'accuracy 82 percent, give or take 2 points', reflecting the uncertainty that comes from measuring only a sample., expectation–maximization algorithmexpectation–maximization algorithm, n.: A method for fitting a model when some information is hidden: guess the hidden parts using the current model, refit the model as if those guesses were right, and repeat until nothing changes., Gaussian processGaussian process, n.: A way of predicting an unknown curve or surface that gives not just a best guess at each point but an honest error bar, narrow near measured points and wide far from them., Kalman filterKalman filter, n.: A method that keeps a running best guess of something you cannot measure exactly, such as a vehicle's position, by blending predictions from a motion model with noisy sensor readings., latent Dirichlet allocationlatent Dirichlet allocation, n.: A popular topic-finding method that assumes every document is a blend of a few themes and every theme favors certain words, then works backward from the words to find both., likelihoodlikelihood, n.: A score for a possible explanation of some data: how probable that explanation, or that setting of a model, would have made the data actually seen., naive Bayesnaive Bayes, n.: A simple, fast way of sorting items into categories using probabilities, which pretends that each clue is independent of the others. It is the classic technique behind early email spam filters., priorprior, n.: What you believe, and how strongly, before looking at the evidence in front of you. In AI it also means built-in assumptions that steer what a system learns., Bayes error rateBayes error rate, n.: The lowest error any classifier could ever achieve on a task, because some cases are genuinely ambiguous: even a perfect model that knew the true odds would still sometimes guess wrong., Bayesian neural networkBayesian neural network, n.: A neural network that keeps a whole range of plausible settings for its internal numbers instead of one best guess, so that it can say how unsure it is about each prediction., evidence lower boundevidence lower bound, n.: A quantity that is always less than or equal to how well a model explains its data, but much easier to calculate; pushing it upward is how models such as VAEs learn., Fisher informationFisher information, n.: A number, or table of numbers, saying how sharply the probability of the data reacts when a model's settings are nudged; the sharper the reaction, the more precisely the data can pin those settings down., Markov chain Monte CarloMarkov chain Monte Carlo, n.: A family of methods for drawing random examples from a complicated probability distribution by taking a long, carefully designed random walk that eventually visits each region in proportion to its probability., maximum a posteriori estimationmaximum a posteriori estimation, n.: Picking the single most believable setting of a model after combining the evidence with what was assumed beforehand. In practice it often amounts to ordinary training plus a penalty that keeps settings modest., Thompson samplingThompson sampling, n.: A way to choose among uncertain options by picking each one about as often as it is likely to be the best, based on everything learned so far., variational inferencevariational inference, n.: A way of approximating a hard-to-compute probability distribution by picking the closest match from a simpler family of distributions, turning a hard problem of adding up every possibility into an optimization problem.